Dimensions
Size comparison
GT3102 4G
| GT3 | 102 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59.3 mm | 118.2 mm | −58.9 mm |
| Width | 48.2 mm | 50.2 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 14.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 57 g | 84 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT3 better than 102 4G?
- Built-in GPSYes · 102 4G: No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 102 4G: No
- Weight57 g vs 84.2 g+48%
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 120 px3.4×
- Pixel density331 ppi vs 100 ppi3.3×
- Thickness13.4 mm vs 14.3 mm+7%
Why is 102 4G better than GT3?
- LTE (cellular)No · GT3: Yes
- Battery capacity530 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+89%
- Screen size1.96″ vs 2″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 59 mm | — |
| Weight | 57 g | 84.2 g |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 59.3 mm | 118.2 mm |
| Width | 48.2 mm | 50.2 mm |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Dark Blue, Red, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.96″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 331 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 530 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, barometer, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Unisoc 8910 FF-S |
