vs
9.8Display4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT3ICE Smart ST 2.0
| GT3 | ICE Smart ST 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 48.2 mm | 41 mm | +7.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT3 better than ICE Smart ST 2.0?
- Screen size1.96″ vs 1.2″+63%
- Battery capacity530 mAh vs 300 mAh+77%
Why is ICE Smart ST 2.0 better than GT3?
ICE Smart ST 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 59 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | 57 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | — |
| Height | 59.3 mm | — |
| Width | 48.2 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Roségold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.96″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | — |
| Pixel density | 331 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 530 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, barometer, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Dive mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
