NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs CMF Watch 3 Pro

Cubot GT3 vs Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro

What GT3 does better (3) and where CMF Watch 3 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $75
9.8Display5.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
4.7Sports & outdoor8.0
3.9Smart features4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3CMF Watch 3 Pro
48.2 × 59.313.447 × 4714.4
GT3CMF Watch 3 ProDifference
Height59.3 mm47 mm+12.3 mm
Width48.2 mm47 mm+1.2 mm
Thickness13.4 mm14.4 mm−1 mm
Weight57 g51 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.43″+37%
  2. Battery capacity530 mAh vs 350 mAh+51%
  3. Thickness13.4 mm vs 14.4 mm+7%

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than GT3?

  1. Weight57 g vs 51 g+12%
  2. Resolution (width)410 px vs 466 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare