NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Redmi Watch 6 Active

Cubot GT3 vs Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6 Active

What GT3 does better (5) and where Redmi Watch 6 Active wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
5 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6 Active
Xiaomi · 2026Redmi Watch 6 Active
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
9.8Display6.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features4.8
3.2Build & durability8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Redmi Watch 6 Active
48.2 × 59.313.439.4 × 44.510
GT3Redmi Watch 6 ActiveDifference
Height59.3 mm44.5 mm+14.8 mm
Width48.2 mm39.4 mm+8.8 mm
Thickness13.4 mm10 mm+3.4 mm
Weight57 g26 g+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Redmi Watch 6 Active?

  1. Built-in GPSYes · Redmi Watch 6 Active: No
  2. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.85″+6%
  3. Battery capacity530 mAh vs 470 mAh+13%
  4. Resolution (width)410 px vs 390 px+5%
  5. Pixel density331 ppi vs 322 ppi+3%

Why is Redmi Watch 6 Active better than GT3?

  1. Weight57 g vs 26 g2.2×
  2. Thickness13.4 mm vs 10 mm+34%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare