Why is U2 better than 106?
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 116 ppi2.3×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
Why is 106 better than U2?
- Battery capacity220 mAh vs 1,000 mAh4.5×
- Screen size1.26″ vs 1.77″+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 73 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.3 mm |
| Height | — | 114.3 mm |
| Width | — | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Pink | Gray, Blue, Teal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.26″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 220 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Unisoc 6533G |
