Why is U2 better than 110 Power?
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 100 ppi2.7×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
Why is 110 Power better than U2?
- Screen size1.26″ vs 2″+59%
- Battery capacity220 mAh vs 1,750 mAh8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 88 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.2 mm |
| Height | — | 117.7 mm |
| Width | — | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Pink | Gray, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.26″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 220 mAh | 1,750 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
