vs
2.1Display5.2
Why is U2 better than Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen?
U2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen better than U2?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · U2: Yes
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
- Screen size1.26″ vs 1.32″+5%
- Battery capacity220 mAh vs 280 mAh+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Pink | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.26″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 220 mAh | 280 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
