NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X3 vs X5

Cubot X3 vs Cubot X5

What X3 does better (4) and where X5 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X3
Cubot · 2025X3
5.4Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Cubot X5
Cubot · 2026X5
4.9Score
3 advantages
4.3Display8.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
2.7Build & durability2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

X3X5
53.8 × 53.813.545.4 × 53.914.4
X3X5Difference
Height53.8 mm53.9 mm−0.1 mm
Width53.8 mm45.4 mm+8.4 mm
Thickness13.5 mm14.4 mm−0.9 mm
Weight95 g84 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X3 better than X5?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  2. Pixel density381 ppi vs 304 ppi+25%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 410 px+14%
  4. Thickness13.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+7%

Why is X5 better than X3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
  2. Screen size1.73″ vs 2.13″+23%
  3. Weight94.6 g vs 84 g+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare