NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X3 vs iGo Watch 4! JW-600

Cubot X3 vs Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600

What X3 does better (4) and where iGo Watch 4! JW-600 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X3
Cubot · 2025X3
5.4Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600
Forever · 2025iGo Watch 4! JW-600
2 advantages≈ $40
4.3Display4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

X3iGo Watch 4! JW-600
53.8 × 53.813.510.6 × 46256
X3iGo Watch 4! JW-600Difference
Height53.8 mm46 mm+7.8 mm
Width53.8 mm10.6 mm+43.2 mm
Thickness13.5 mm256 mm−242.5 mm
Weight95 g34 g+61 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X3 better than iGo Watch 4! JW-600?

  1. Thickness13.5 mm vs 256 mm19×
  2. Battery capacity900 mAh vs 280 mAh3.2×
  3. Screen size1.73″ vs 1.28″+35%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 416 px+12%

Why is iGo Watch 4! JW-600 better than X3?

  1. Weight94.6 g vs 33.9 g2.8×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare