Dimensions
Size comparison
X3101 4G
| X3 | 101 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 53.8 mm | 118.2 mm | −64.4 mm |
| Width | 53.8 mm | 50.2 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 13.5 mm | 14.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 84 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X3 better than 101 4G?
- Built-in GPSYes · 101 4G: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 120 px3.9×
- Pixel density381 ppi vs 100 ppi3.8×
- Thickness13.5 mm vs 14.3 mm+6%
Why is 101 4G better than X3?
- LTE (cellular)No · X3: Yes
- Screen size1.73″ vs 2″+16%
- Weight94.6 g vs 83.5 g+13%
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | — |
| Weight | 94.6 g | 83.5 g |
| Thickness | 13.5 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 53.8 mm | 118.2 mm |
| Width | 53.8 mm | 50.2 mm |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Dark Blue, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.73″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 381 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, barometer, compass | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Unisoc 8910 FF-S |
