NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X3 vs Galaxy Watch8 Classic

Cubot X3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic

What X3 does better (4) and where Galaxy Watch8 Classic wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X3
Cubot · 2025X3
5.4Score
4 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8 Classic
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
4.3Display9.1
5.0Health tracking8.2
8.0Sports & outdoor3.1
3.9Smart features7.9
2.7Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

X3Galaxy Watch8 Classic
53.8 × 53.813.546 × 46.410.6
X3Galaxy Watch8 ClassicDifference
Height53.8 mm46.4 mm+7.4 mm
Width53.8 mm46 mm+7.8 mm
Thickness13.5 mm10.6 mm+2.9 mm
Weight95 g64 g+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X3 better than Galaxy Watch8 Classic?

  1. Screen size1.73″ vs 1.34″+29%
  2. Battery capacity900 mAh vs 445 mAh2×
  3. Pixel density381 ppi vs 327 ppi+17%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 438 px+6%

Why is Galaxy Watch8 Classic better than X3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
  2. NFC paymentsNo · X3: Yes
  3. LTE (cellular)No · X3: Yes
  4. Weight94.6 g vs 63.5 g+49%
  5. eSIMNo · X3: Yes
  6. Thickness13.5 mm vs 10.6 mm+27%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare