vs
4.3Display5.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor4.7
3.9Smart features6.5
2.7Build & durability5.1
Why is X3 better than Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
- Screen size1.73″ vs 1.43″+21%
- Pixel density381 ppi vs 326 ppi+17%
Why is Black Shark GS3 Ultra better than X3?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · X3: Yes
- NFC paymentsNo · X3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | — |
| Weight | 94.6 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.5 mm | — |
| Height | 53.8 mm | — |
| Width | 53.8 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.73″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 381 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, barometer, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
