Why is SW-162 better than 5010?
SW-162 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 5010 better than SW-162?
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.38″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | IPS | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 168 h |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
