vs
2.4Display2.0
9.8Health tracking4.9
Why is SW-162 better than TechLife Watch R100?
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.32″+6%
Why is TechLife Watch R100 better than SW-162?
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 380 mAh2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 54 mm |
| Weight | — | 46 g |
| Thickness | — | 12.2 mm |
| Height | — | 54.1 mm |
| Width | — | 46 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | IPS | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 360 px |
| Pixel density | — | 278 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
