Why is SWC-195 better than PSW 300?
- Screen size2.04″ vs 1.85″+10%
Why is PSW 300 better than SWC-195?
PSW 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 41 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.04″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 240 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
