Why is SWC-195 better than Ares 3?
- Screen size2.04″ vs 1.75″+17%
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 240 px+53%
Why is Ares 3 better than SWC-195?
Ares 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | — | 12.7 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.04″ | 1.75″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | 296 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 380 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
