vs
5.8Display3.6
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is SWC-338 better than Smart Band 11 Active?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Smart Band 11 Active: No
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 172 px+40%
Why is Smart Band 11 Active better than SWC-338?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.47″+7%
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 300 mAh+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | — | 18 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.2 mm |
| Height | — | 43.5 mm |
| Width | — | 25.8 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 172 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 320 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 21 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Denver SWC-338vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Active6.97.8
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsHama Fit Watch 50005.45.1vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsHEYRO Fit 215.44.7vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsNilox ONAIRvsXiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Active5.47.8vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsSekonda Active Plus5.44.6