vs
2.5Display3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
CS1Hardcase H10
| CS1 | Hardcase H10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41.5 mm | 109 mm | −67.5 mm |
| Width | 35.9 mm | 49 mm | −13.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 15 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 80 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CS1 better than Hardcase H10?
- Weight45 g vs 80 g+78%
- Pixel density242 ppi vs 114 ppi2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 15 mm+69%
Why is Hardcase H10 better than CS1?
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 1,000 mAh5×
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.8″+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | — |
| Weight | 45 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 41.5 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 35.9 mm | 49 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Graphite Black, Space Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 242 ppi | 114 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | — |
| RAM | — | 0.031 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | nRF52832 | Mediatek MT6261A |
