vs
3.4Display2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hardcase H10Redmi Watch
| Hardcase H10 | Redmi Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 109 mm | 41 mm | +68 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 35 mm | +14 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 11.9 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 35 g | +45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hardcase H10 better than Redmi Watch?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 230 mAh4.3×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.4″+29%
Why is Redmi Watch better than Hardcase H10?
- Built-in GPSNo · Hardcase H10: Yes
- Weight80 g vs 35 g2.3×
- NFC paymentsNo · Hardcase H10: Yes
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 320 px2.5×
- Pixel density114 ppi vs 323 ppi2.8×
- Thickness15 mm vs 11.9 mm+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 41 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 11.9 mm |
| Height | 109 mm | 41 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 35 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Ivory |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.4″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 114 ppi | 323 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 230 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| RAM | 0.031 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261A | — |
