vs
3.4Display2.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hardcase H10Watch
| Hardcase H10 | Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 109 mm | 42 mm | +67 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 37 mm | +12 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 12 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 35 g | +45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hardcase H10 better than Watch?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 210 mAh4.8×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.3″+38%
Why is Watch better than Hardcase H10?
- Weight80 g vs 35 g2.3×
- Pixel density114 ppi vs 261 ppi2.3×
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 240 px+88%
- Thickness15 mm vs 12 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 42 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 109 mm | 42 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Coral Pink, Turquoise |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 114 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| RAM | 0.031 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261A | — |
