Dimensions
Size comparison
E2102
| E2 | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 116 mm | 114.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 13.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 74 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E2 better than 102?
E2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 102 better than E2?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 74.3 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 116 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Unisoc SC6531E |
