vs
5.5Health tracking5.5
2.9Build & durability4.3
Why is Charge 6 better than Watch Fit 4?
Charge 6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch Fit 4 better than Charge 6?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 10 days+43%
- Weight51 g vs 27 g+89%
- Screen size1″ vs 1.82″+82%
- Battery capacity65 mAh vs 400 mAh6.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 27 g |
| Thickness | — | 9.5 mm |
| Height | — | 43 mm |
| Width | — | 38 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.82″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 408 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 480 px |
| Pixel density | — | 347 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, compass, barometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | — | Yes |
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
