vs
5.7Display7.7
9.0Health tracking5.5
7.5Build & durability2.3
Why is Edge better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight18 g vs 200 g11.1×
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Edge?
- Battery capacity65 mAh vs 350 mAh5.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 39 mm | — |
| Weight | 18 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 11.6 mm | — |
| Height | 39.2 mm | — |
| Width | 25.6 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.34″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, temperature, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
