vs
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than SW-7204 Smartwatch?
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 200 mAh+75%
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
Why is SW-7204 Smartwatch better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
SW-7204 Smartwatch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 33 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.28″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Watch Fit 4vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.07.06.4
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsFitbit Air
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsXiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro Ceramic6.46.2
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch
