vs
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than SW-7204 Smartwatch?
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 200 mAh+75%
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
Why is SW-7204 Smartwatch better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
SW-7204 Smartwatch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 33 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.28″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsMotorola Moto Watch 2 Fit6.66.1
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Quantum Smartwatch
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsFitbit Air

