Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0 vs Motorola Moto Watch 2 Fit

What Ice Fit RT 3.0 does better (0) and where Moto Watch 2 Fit wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Ice Watch · 2026Ice Fit RT 3.0

6.6Score

0 advantages≈ $100

Higher score

6.1Score

2 advantages≈ $130

7.7Display6.9

5.5Health tracking5.5

2.3Build & durability3.9

Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Moto Watch 2 Fit?

Ice Fit RT 3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0≈ $1006.6	Motorola Moto Watch 2 Fit≈ $1306.1
Design & durability
Case size	—	43 mm
Weight	200 g	28 g
Thickness	—	10 mm
Height	—	42.9 mm
Width	—	38.7 mm
Case material	—	Aluminium
Lens / cover glass	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Strap material	Silikon	—
Water resistance	5 ATM	5 ATM
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Water rating (maker)	5 ATM	—
Colours	—	Pantone: Tracing Gray, Elegance
Display
Screen size	—	1.85″
Display technology	AMOLED	OLED
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO OLED
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	Yes
Always-on display	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	390 px	390 px
Resolution (height)	450 px	450 px
Pixel density	—	322 ppi
Peak brightness	—	1,500 nits
LTPO display	—	Yes
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery capacity	350 mAh	400 mAh
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
Sleep tracking	Yes	—
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, PPG (SpO2, heart rate)
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite systems	GPS	—
Compass	—	Yes
Multisport / triathlon mode	Yes	—
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	No
LTE (cellular)	—	No
eSIM	—	No
Bluetooth	—	5.4
Smart features
Speaker	—	Yes
Platform
Operating system	—	RTOS
Platform	—	Proprietary
Works with	iOS	—