vs
5.5Health tracking5.5
2.3Build & durability3.4
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Smart Band 10 Pro Ceramic?
Ice Fit RT 3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smart Band 10 Pro Ceramic better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight200 g vs 28.7 g7×
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 480 px+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 28.7 g |
| Thickness | — | 9.7 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.74″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 336 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 15 days |
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS | Android, iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Watch Fit 4vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.07.06.4vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsFitbit Air
vsXiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro CeramicvsKodak SW-7204 SmartwatchvsXiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro CeramicvsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass