vs
3.6Display2.2
9.8Health tracking4.9
Why is ForeVive 3 SB-340 better than FW51?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 7 days2.1×
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.09″+21%
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 130 mAh+54%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 240 px+50%
Why is FW51 better than ForeVive 3 SB-340?
FW51 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Lens / cover glass | Kristallglas | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.09″ |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 15 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 130 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
| Chipset | — | Realtek RTK8762DK |
