NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S50 vs Grit X2

Garmin Approach S50 vs Polar Grit X2

What Approach S50 does better (3) and where Grit X2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Polar Grit X2
Polar · 2025Grit X2
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ $520
5.3Display6.4
2.7Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
3.2Sports & outdoor2.9
3.9Build & durability4.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S50Grit X2
43 × 4311.444.7 × 44.712.5
Approach S50Grit X2Difference
Height43 mm44.7 mm−1.7 mm
Width43 mm44.7 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness11.4 mm12.5 mm−1.1 mm
Weight29 g62 g−33 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S50 better than Grit X2?

  1. Weight29 g vs 62 g2.1×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 8 days+25%
  3. Thickness11.4 mm vs 12.5 mm+10%

Why is Grit X2 better than Approach S50?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 25 h+67%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare