NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S50 vs Vantage M3

Garmin Approach S50 vs Polar Vantage M3

What Approach S50 does better (3) and where Vantage M3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
4 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
5.3Display6.4
2.7Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
3.2Sports & outdoor2.9
3.9Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S50Vantage M3
43 × 4311.444.7 × 44.712.2
Approach S50Vantage M3Difference
Height43 mm44.7 mm−1.7 mm
Width43 mm44.7 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness11.4 mm12.2 mm−0.8 mm
Weight29 g53 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S50 better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 8 days+25%
  2. Weight29 g vs 53 g+83%
  3. Thickness11.4 mm vs 12.2 mm+7%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Approach S50?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 27 h+80%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare