NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S62 vs Grit X Pro

Garmin Approach S62 vs Polar Grit X Pro

What Approach S62 does better (4) and where Grit X Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S62
Garmin · 2020Approach S62
3.9Score
4 advantages≈ $500
vs
Polar Grit X Pro
Polar · 2021Grit X Pro
4.0Score
3 advantages≈ $570
Higher score
3.8Display3.4
3.8Battery life3.5
4.9Health tracking2.1
2.6Sports & outdoor2.2
2.3Build & durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S62Grit X Pro
47 × 4714.847 × 4713
Approach S62Grit X ProDifference
Height47 mm47 mm=
Width47 mm47 mm=
Thickness14.8 mm13 mm+1.8 mm
Weight61 g79 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S62 better than Grit X Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 6 days2.3×
  2. Weight61 g vs 79 g+30%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%

Why is Grit X Pro better than Approach S62?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 35 h+75%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Thickness14.8 mm vs 13 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare