NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S70 42mm vs Vantage M3

Garmin Approach S70 42mm vs Polar Vantage M3

What Approach S70 42mm does better (2) and where Vantage M3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S70 42mm
Garmin · 2023Approach S70 42mm
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $650
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
5 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
5.3Display6.4
2.7Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
3.2Sports & outdoor2.9
2.9Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S70 42mmVantage M3
42 × 4212.644.7 × 44.712.2
Approach S70 42mmVantage M3Difference
Height42 mm44.7 mm−2.7 mm
Width42 mm44.7 mm−2.7 mm
Thickness12.6 mm12.2 mm+0.4 mm
Weight44 g53 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S70 42mm better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 8 days+25%
  2. Weight44 g vs 53 g+20%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Approach S70 42mm?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 27 h+80%
  2. Storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
  5. Thickness12.6 mm vs 12.2 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare