NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk2S vs Descent Mk3 43mm

Garmin Descent Mk2S vs Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm

What Descent Mk2S does better (1) and where Descent Mk3 43mm wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk2S
Garmin · 2021Descent Mk2S
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $1,000
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
9 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
2.9Display6.0
2.2Battery life3.4
4.9Health tracking9.4
4.8Sports & outdoor6.9
6.5Smart features6.5
9.6Build & durability9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk2SDescent Mk3 43mm
43 × 4314.243 × 4314.2
Descent Mk2SDescent Mk3 43mmDifference
Height43 mm43 mm=
Width43 mm43 mm=
Thickness14.2 mm14.2 mm=
Weight60 g54 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk2S better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery saver mode21 days vs 12 days+75%

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Descent Mk2S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 10 days+43%
  2. GPS battery life18 h vs 28 h+56%
  3. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
  4. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Descent Mk2S: Yes
  5. Sport profiles44 vs 982.2×
  6. Rated dive depth100 m vs 200 m2×
  7. Weight60 g vs 53.5 g+12%
  8. Resolution (width)240 px vs 390 px+62%
  9. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare