NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Vantage V3

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Polar Vantage V3

What Fenix E 47mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Vantage V3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage V3
Polar · 2023Vantage V3
5.6Score
6 advantages≈ $650
5.7Display8.3
6.7Battery life5.2
4.9Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor2.9
5.0Build & durability3.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDVantage V3
47 × 4714.547.3 × 47.313.5
Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDVantage V3Difference
Height47 mm47.3 mm−0.3 mm
Width47 mm47.3 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.5 mm+1 mm
Weight76 g57 g+19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Vantage V3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 11 days+45%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×

Why is Vantage V3 better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight76 g vs 57 g+33%
  2. Storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
  5. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.5 mm+7%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 327 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare