vs
3.5Display2.1
4.8Battery life6.4
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor4.2
2.7Build & durability5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Forerunner 255Instinct 2S Solar
| Forerunner 255 | Instinct 2S Solar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.6 mm | 40 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 45.6 mm | 40 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 49 g | 43 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Forerunner 255 better than Instinct 2S Solar?
- GPS battery life30 h vs 22 h+36%
- Storage4 GB vs 0.03 GB133.3×
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.12″+16%
- Resolution (width)260 px vs 156 px+67%
- Pixel density200 ppi vs 139 ppi+44%
- Sport profiles58 vs 50+16%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%
Why is Instinct 2S Solar better than Forerunner 255?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 21 days+50%
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
- Weight49 g vs 43 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 40 mm |
| Weight | 49 g | 43 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.3 mm |
| Height | 45.6 mm | 40 mm |
| Width | 45.6 mm | 40 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Sapphire crystal | No | No |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3 | Power Glass™ |
| Strap material | silicone | silicone |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 10 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 10 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.12″ |
| Display technology | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) |
| Panel | Sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel | Monochrome, sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 260 px | 156 px |
| Resolution (height) | 260 px | 156 px |
| Pixel density | 200 ppi | 139 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 21 days |
| Battery saver mode | — | 50 days |
| GPS battery life | 30 h | 22 h |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 16 h | — |
| Battery type | Lithium ion | Lithium ion |
| Solar charging | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Charging | Garmin proprietary plug charger | Garmin proprietary plug charger |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | Yes |
| HRV tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, SatIQ technology, Elevate wrist heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Barometric altimeter, Compass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Thermometer | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Elevate wrist heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Barometric altimeter, Compass, Accelerometer, Thermometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | Yes |
| Sport profiles | 58 | 50 |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Smart features | ||
| Storage | 4 GB | 0.03 GB |
| Third-party apps | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Garmin OS | Garmin OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsDiesel Griffed Gen 64.23.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsGarmin Forerunner 9654.26.0
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsGarmin Forerunner 2654.24.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsPolar Pacer Pro4.23.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsAsus VivoWatch 54.23.8
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255SvsGarmin Forerunner 2553.94.2

