NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255 vs 9 Peak

Garmin Forerunner 255 vs Suunto 9 Peak

What Forerunner 255 does better (6) and where 9 Peak wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255
4.2Score
6 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Suunto 9 Peak
Suunto · 20219 Peak
4.2Score
4 advantages
3.5Display3.0
4.8Battery life2.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor2.4
2.7Build & durability9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 2559 Peak
45.6 × 45.612.943 × 4310.6
Forerunner 2559 PeakDifference
Height45.6 mm43 mm+2.6 mm
Width45.6 mm43 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness12.9 mm10.6 mm+2.3 mm
Weight49 g62 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255 better than 9 Peak?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 7 days2×
  2. Dual-band GPSYes · 9 Peak: No
  3. GPS battery life30 h vs 25 h+20%
  4. Weight49 g vs 62 g+27%
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%

Why is 9 Peak better than Forerunner 255?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 255: Yes
  3. Sport profiles58 vs 80+38%
  4. Thickness12.9 mm vs 10.6 mm+22%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare