NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265S vs Vantage M3

Garmin Forerunner 265S vs Polar Vantage M3

What Forerunner 265S does better (2) and where Vantage M3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
5 advantages≈ $430
5.0Display6.4
3.9Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.0Sports & outdoor2.9
3.5Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265SVantage M3
41.7 × 41.712.944.7 × 44.712.2
Forerunner 265SVantage M3Difference
Height41.7 mm44.7 mm−3 mm
Width41.7 mm44.7 mm−3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight39 g53 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 8 days+88%
  2. Weight39 g vs 53 g+36%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. GPS battery life24 h vs 27 h+12%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  3. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.28″+16%
  4. Resolution (width)360 px vs 416 px+16%
  5. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare