NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 570 42mm vs Vantage M3

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm vs Polar Vantage M3

What Forerunner 570 42mm does better (2) and where Vantage M3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $550
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
5 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
5.3Display6.4
2.6Battery life3.0
9.4Health tracking8.3
5.5Sports & outdoor2.9
3.0Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 570 42mmVantage M3
42.4 × 42.412.944.7 × 44.712.2
Forerunner 570 42mmVantage M3Difference
Height42.4 mm44.7 mm−2.3 mm
Width42.4 mm44.7 mm−2.3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight42 g53 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 8 days+25%
  2. Weight42 g vs 53 g+26%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. GPS battery life18 h vs 27 h+50%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
  5. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare