NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 570 47mm vs Vantage M3

Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm vs Polar Vantage M3

What Forerunner 570 47mm does better (4) and where Vantage M3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 47mm
4.7Score
4 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $430
6.5Display6.4
3.0Battery life3.0
9.4Health tracking8.3
5.5Sports & outdoor2.9
2.6Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 570 47mmVantage M3
47 × 4712.944.7 × 44.712.2
Forerunner 570 47mmVantage M3Difference
Height47 mm44.7 mm+2.3 mm
Width47 mm44.7 mm+2.3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight50 g53 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 570 47mm better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 8 days+38%
  2. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.28″+9%
  3. Weight50 g vs 53 g+6%
  4. Resolution (width)454 px vs 416 px+9%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Forerunner 570 47mm?

  1. GPS battery life18 h vs 27 h+50%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  3. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare