NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Vantage M3

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Polar Vantage M3

What Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED does better (4) and where Vantage M3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $430
5.6Display6.4
7.3Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
6.6Sports & outdoor2.9
5.4Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDVantage M3
50 × 5014.444.7 × 44.712.2
Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDVantage M3Difference
Height50 mm44.7 mm+5.3 mm
Width50 mm44.7 mm+5.3 mm
Thickness14.4 mm12.2 mm+2.2 mm
Weight59 g53 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 8 days3×
  2. GPS battery life40 h vs 27 h+48%
  3. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  4. LED flashlightYes · Vantage M3: No

Why is Vantage M3 better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  2. Weight59 g vs 53 g+11%
  3. Thickness14.4 mm vs 12.2 mm+18%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare