NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm Solar vs Race 2

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar vs Suunto Race 2

What Instinct 3 50mm Solar does better (3) and where Race 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
8 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
4.0Display6.3
8.8Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.2Sports & outdoor6.4
5.5Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm SolarRace 2
50 × 5014.449 × 4912.5
Instinct 3 50mm SolarRace 2Difference
Height50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Width50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.4 mm12.5 mm+1.9 mm
Weight58 g76 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)40 days vs 18 days2.2×
  2. Weight58 g vs 76 g+31%
  3. Screen size1.56″ vs 1.5″+4%

Why is Race 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)176 px vs 466 px2.6×
  3. Pixel density113 ppi vs 311 ppi2.8×
  4. Storage0.12 GB vs 32 GB266.7×
  5. GPS battery life60 h vs 65 h+8%
  6. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: Yes
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 55 h+62%
  8. Thickness14.4 mm vs 12.5 mm+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare