NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm Solar vs Vertical 2

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Instinct 3 50mm Solar does better (3) and where Vertical 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
4.0Display6.3
8.8Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.2Sports & outdoor6.4
5.5Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm SolarVertical 2
50 × 5014.449 × 4913.6
Instinct 3 50mm SolarVertical 2Difference
Height50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Width50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.4 mm13.6 mm+0.8 mm
Weight58 g87 g−29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)40 days vs 20 days2×
  2. Weight58 g vs 87 g+50%
  3. Screen size1.56″ vs 1.5″+4%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: Yes
  2. GPS battery life60 h vs 75 h+25%
  3. Resolution (width)176 px vs 466 px2.6×
  4. Pixel density113 ppi vs 311 ppi2.8×
  5. Storage0.12 GB vs 32 GB266.7×
  6. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: Yes
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 65 h+91%
  8. Thickness14.4 mm vs 13.6 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare