NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED vs Vertical 2

Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED does better (4) and where Vertical 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
7.5Display6.3
9.4Battery life8.5
8.3Health tracking4.9
8.2Sports & outdoor6.4
6.4Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Quatix 8 51mm AMOLEDVertical 2
51 × 5114.749 × 4913.6
Quatix 8 51mm AMOLEDVertical 2Difference
Height51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Width51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.7 mm13.6 mm+1.1 mm
Weight92 g87 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)29 days vs 20 days+45%
  2. GPS battery life84 h vs 75 h+12%
  3. Sport profiles99 vs 95+4%
  4. Pixel density324 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.5″+7%
  2. Weight92 g vs 87 g+6%
  3. Thickness14.7 mm vs 13.6 mm+8%
  4. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare