NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Venu vs Vivoactive 4

Garmin Venu vs Garmin Vivoactive 4

What Venu does better (5) and where Vivoactive 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Venu
Garmin · 2019Venu
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ $350
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
5.0Battery life5.3
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.3Sports & outdoor2.4
7.3Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

VenuVivoactive 4
43.2 × 43.212.445.1 × 45.112.8
VenuVivoactive 4Difference
Height43.2 mm45.1 mm−1.9 mm
Width43.2 mm45.1 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness12.4 mm12.8 mm−0.4 mm
Weight46 g50 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Venu better than Vivoactive 4?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 18 h+11%
  2. Weight46.3 g vs 50.5 g+9%
  3. Pixel density325 ppi vs 200 ppi+62%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 260 px+50%
  5. Thickness12.4 mm vs 12.8 mm+3%

Why is Vivoactive 4 better than Venu?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 8 days+60%
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  3. Sport profiles16 vs 19+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare