NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Venu vs Vivoactive 4S

Garmin Venu vs Garmin Vivoactive 4S

What Venu does better (5) and where Vivoactive 4S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Venu
Garmin · 2019Venu
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4S
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4S
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ $350
5.0Battery life4.3
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.3Sports & outdoor2.4
7.3Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

VenuVivoactive 4S
43.2 × 43.212.440 × 4012.7
VenuVivoactive 4SDifference
Height43.2 mm40 mm+3.2 mm
Width43.2 mm40 mm+3.2 mm
Thickness12.4 mm12.7 mm−0.3 mm
Weight46 g40 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Venu better than Vivoactive 4S?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 15 h+33%
  2. Resolution (width)390 px vs 218 px+79%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  4. Pixel density325 ppi vs 198 ppi+64%
  5. Thickness12.4 mm vs 12.7 mm+2%

Why is Vivoactive 4S better than Venu?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 7 days+40%
  2. Weight46.3 g vs 40 g+16%
  3. Sport profiles16 vs 19+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare