vs
2.3Display4.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is 5010 better than Prowatch ZN?
5010 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Prowatch ZN better than 5010?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 5010: Yes
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.43″+4%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Silver | Black, Tarnish |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
