vs
2.3Display4.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is 5010 better than FW55 Aurum Pro?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 6 days+17%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 230 mAh+30%
Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than 5010?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.7″+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 46 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 255 mm |
| Width | — | 38 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | Silver | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | LCD | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 6 days |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 230 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
