Why is 5010 better than 105 4G?
5010 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 105 4G better than 5010?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 1,020 mAh3.4×
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.8″+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 80.2 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.5 mm |
| Height | — | 121 mm |
| Width | — | 50 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | Silver | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
