vs
5.1Display4.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
8900Nord Watch
| 8900 | Nord Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 37.2 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 52 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than Nord Watch?
- Weight40 g vs 52.4 g+31%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 230 mAh+30%
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 368 px+27%
Why is Nord Watch better than 8900?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.78″+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 52.4 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.4 mm |
| Height | — | 45.2 mm |
| Width | — | 37.2 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Midnight Black, Deep Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 448 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 230 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
