NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 8900 vs Galaxy Watch FE

Hama 8900 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What 8900 does better (3) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Hama 8900
Hama · 20238900
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $90
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
1 advantage≈ $110
Higher score
5.1Display5.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

8900Galaxy Watch FE
42 × 4239.3 × 40.49.8
8900Galaxy Watch FEDifference
Case size42 mm39.3 mm+2.7 mm
Weight40 g27 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 8900 better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  2. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 247 mAh+21%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 396 px+18%

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than 8900?

  1. Weight40 g vs 26.6 g+50%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare