Dimensions
Size comparison
89002.0 SW033
| 8900 | 2.0 SW033 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 45 mm | −3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than 2.0 SW033?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 2.0 SW033: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 200 mAh+50%
Why is 2.0 SW033 better than 8900?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.7″+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 10.4 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | OLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
